ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
Patterns of the assessment in intellectual disability for unique disability identity (UDID): A two-year study.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intellectual Disability poses the significant public health challenge and stigma. Notably, there has been a steady increase over the past few years in the issuance of Unique Disability Identity (UDID) cards, which are specifically designated for individuals with disabilities. Aim: To examine socio-demographic patterns and clinical profiles of individuals certified with intellectual disability (ID) for UDID. Methods: This is a hospital-based cross-sectional study observed over 2 years at a tertiary care government hospital. Data from 960 applicants assessed for ID certification were chart reviewed. Diagnoses followed ICD-10 criteria, and standardized intelligence tests determined the level of ID. Results: Mean age was 17.5 years. Of the applicants, 2.3% had borderline intelligence, 37.2% mild ID, 36.04% moderate, 15.8% severe, and 8.4% profound. Males comprised 63.2%, females 36.7%. Only 1.77% were employed. Conclusion: The UDID initiative improves access to welfare and support services for individuals with ID, highlighting the need for ongoing policy and rehabilitation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.