ArticleMachine Learning. Health2025
Adaptive radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a 3D multi-headed U-Net deep learning architecture.
Article in Machine Learning. Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) personalizes treatment plans by accounting for daily anatomical changes, requiring workflows distinct from conventional radiotherapy. Deep learning-based dose prediction models can enhance treatment planning efficiency by rapidly generating accuracy dose distributions, reducing manual trial-and-error and accelerating the overall workflow; however, most existing approaches overlook critical pre-treatment plan information-specifically, physician-defined clinical objectives tailored to individual patients. To address this limitation, we introduce the multi-headed U-Net (MHU-Net), a novel architecture that explicitly incorporates physician intent from pre-treatment plans to improve dose prediction accuracy in adaptive head and neck cancer treatments. Our dataset comprised 43 patients, each with pre-treatment plans, adaptive treatment plans, structure sets, and CT images. MHU-Net builds upon the widely adopted Stander U-Net architecture, extending it with a dual-head design: the primary head processes adaptive session contours and their corresponding signed distance maps, while the secondary head integrates pre-treatment contours, signed distance maps, and dose distributions. The features are merged within a primary U-Net framework to enhance dose prediction accuracy for adaptive treatment sessions. To evaluate the effectiveness of MHU-Net, we conducted a comparative analysis against U-Net. On average, MHU-Net reduced organ-at-risk dose prediction errors, achieving 1.78% lower maximum dose error and 1.22% lower mean dose error compared to U-Net. For the planning target volume, MHU-Net demonstrated significantly improved accuracy, with maximum and mean dose errors of 3.54 ± 2.75% and 1.07 ± 0.88%, respectively, outperforming U-Net's corresponding errors of 5.36 ± 4.19% and 2.76 ± 2.22% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.