Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917990›Full record

ArticleMachine Learning. Health2025

Adaptive radiotherapy dose prediction on head and neck cancer patients with a 3D multi-headed U-Net deep learning architecture.

Hui-Ju Wang, Austen Maniscalco, David Sher, Mu-Han Lin, Steve Jiang, Dan Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine Learning. Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui-Ju WangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9116-5183
Austen ManiscalcoMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7156-3239
David SherMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Mu-Han LinMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Steve JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-6752
Dan NguyenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9590-0655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) personalizes treatment plans by accounting for daily anatomical changes, requiring workflows distinct from conventional radiotherapy. Deep learning-based dose prediction models can enhance treatment planning efficiency by rapidly generating accuracy dose distributions, reducing manual trial-and-error and accelerating the overall workflow; however, most existing approaches overlook critical pre-treatment plan information-specifically, physician-defined clinical objectives tailored to individual patients. To address this limitation, we introduce the multi-headed U-Net (MHU-Net), a novel architecture that explicitly incorporates physician intent from pre-treatment plans to improve dose prediction accuracy in adaptive head and neck cancer treatments. Our dataset comprised 43 patients, each with pre-treatment plans, adaptive treatment plans, structure sets, and CT images. MHU-Net builds upon the widely adopted Stander U-Net architecture, extending it with a dual-head design: the primary head processes adaptive session contours and their corresponding signed distance maps, while the secondary head integrates pre-treatment contours, signed distance maps, and dose distributions. The features are merged within a primary U-Net framework to enhance dose prediction accuracy for adaptive treatment sessions. To evaluate the effectiveness of MHU-Net, we conducted a comparative analysis against U-Net. On average, MHU-Net reduced organ-at-risk dose prediction errors, achieving 1.78% lower maximum dose error and 1.22% lower mean dose error compared to U-Net. For the planning target volume, MHU-Net demonstrated significantly improved accuracy, with maximum and mean dose errors of 3.54  ±  2.75% and 1.07 ± 0.88%, respectively, outperforming U-Net's corresponding errors of 5.36 ± 4.19% and 2.76 ± 2.22% (

Indexed as

adaptive radiation therapyartificial intelligencedose predictionhead and neck cancer

Identifiers

PMID40917990
PMCPMC12412777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.