ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
A successful telenursing experience: Development of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SurgeryMate app: developing and evaluating a training app for surgical instruments and operating room equipment.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelenursing is a component of telemedicine. The role and impact of telenursing in orthopedic nursing are unclear. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was a multi-method study. In the first and second phases of the design and implementation of the web application, the waterfall model was used with the collaboration of 127 patients with orthopedic conditions and four nurses. The third phase evaluated the web application through qualitative and quantitative approaches conducted with semi-structured interviews with 18 patients after four months of using the web application and reporting with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. A quantitative evaluation was done with the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) with the collaboration of 127 patients after four months.
resultsMARS results showed that the average score for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the performance dimension and validity in the information dimension was greater than four for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the dimension of performance and credibility in the dimension of information. Friedman's test indicated that the beauty dimension received the first rank and the information dimension received the fifth rank. Qualitative results suggested that the results of the interview were categorized into 64 codes, seven subclasses, and finally, two main classes including advantages and positive points and disadvantages and points requiring improvement.
conclusionsThe results of this study indicated that the design, implementation, and evaluation of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application was a successful experience in telenursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.