ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Experiences of pregnant women, midwifery students, and their instructors from implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program in labor and delivery wards.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical leadership and mentorship have been introduced as novel approaches to enhance clinical education and improve the quality of services provided by healthcare providers. This study aimed to explain the experiences of pregnant women, midwifery students, and their instructors from implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program in labor and delivery wards. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted after implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program from October 2023 to March 2024. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with midwifery students, midwifery instructors, and pregnant women receiving services in the labor and delivery wards of selected educational-therapeutic centers. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis, based on the criteria proposed by Graneheim and Lundman, and using MAXQDA 10 software (developed by VERBI Software Group, Berlin, Germany).
resultsSix main categories and 17 subcategories emerged in this study. The main categories included as follows: enhancing the quality of clinical education, promoting a teamwork approach, achieving professional competence, providing woman-centered care, barriers to program implementation, and facilitating factors and solutions for program implementation.
conclusionsBased on the findings of this study, implementing a clinical leadership and mentorship program could enhance the clinical skills of midwifery students and improve the quality of midwifery services provided to pregnant women during labor and delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.