ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Knowledge, awareness and attitude of healthcare professionals toward the use of ChatGpt: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChatGPT is increasingly finding its applicability in various aspects of life, including the healthcare system. However, its use is not so much prevalent as of now among healthcare professionals. The present study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitude of healthcare professionals toward the use of ChatGPT. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted using a pre-validated itemed survey form. This pre-validated itemed survey form was circulated among 300 healthcare professionals. The questionnaire items were pertaining to the study respondents' knowledge, its use, and opinions with regard to ChatGPT influence over healthcare profession. SPSS statistical software (version 16.0) was used for analyzing observations. Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous type of data was observed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range). Categorical data was entered as frequencies and/or percentage. Correlations between degrees of agreement and demographic characteristics were done by two-tailed independent"t-test" with significance set at
resultsStatistically significant level of knowledge (
conclusionAccording to this study, healthcare professionals have little knowledge regarding ChatGPT and have no acceptance for the use of this technology in the healthcare field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.