Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917940›Full record

ReviewCritical care research and practice2025

Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.

Ali Riahi, Mohammad Sepehr Yazdani, Reza Eshraghi, Motahare Karimi Houyeh, Ashkan Bahrami, Sara Khoshdooz, Mahshid Amini, Ehsan Behzadi, Amirreza Khalaji, Seyed Masoud Moeini Taba and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ali RiahiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-6457
Mohammad Sepehr YazdaniStudent Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0854-3172
Reza EshraghiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-3851
Motahare Karimi HouyehStudent Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Ashkan BahramiStudent Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-2567
Sara KhoshdoozFaculty of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mahshid AminiStudent Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0693-830X
Ehsan BehzadiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Amirreza KhalajiFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-1683
Seyed Masoud Moeini TabaDepartment of Nephrology, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Reza HashemianClinical Tuberculosis and Epidemiology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-9168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly among critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Traditional diagnostic approaches, such as the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, often detect sepsis after significant organ dysfunction has occurred, limiting the potential for early intervention. In this study, we reviewed how artificial intelligence (AI)-driven methodologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP), can aid physicians. AI, in this case, particularly ML, processes massive amounts of real-time clinical data, vital signs, lab results, and patient history and can detect subtle patterns and predict sepsis earlier than traditional methods like SOFA or SIRS, which often lag behind after the presentation of the sequela. Models like random forest, XGBoost, and neural networks achieve high accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores (0.8-0.99) in ICU and emergency settings, enabling timely intervention by distinguishing sepsis from similar conditions despite the lack of perfect biomarkers. In practice, however, there are several potential pitfalls. Algorithmic bias due to nonrepresentative data, data fragmentation, lack of validation, and explainability issues are current barriers in developed models. Future research should address these limitations and develop more sophisticated models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningICUmachine learningsepsis diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID40917940
PMCPMC12411037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.