Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917929›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025

Nomogram Model for Identifying the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Based on Deep Learning Radiomics and Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study.

Hupo Bian, Huiying Qian, Shaoqi Zhu, Jingnan Xue, Luying Qi, Xiuhua Peng, Mei Li, Yifeng Zheng, Pengliang Xu, Hongxing Zhao and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantitative Imaging to Illuminate Cardiovascular Risk in COPD-Progress, Context, and the Path Ahead.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hupo Bian *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-6857-1611
Huiying Qian *School of Medicine (School of Nursing), Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Shaoqi ZhuSchool of Medicine (School of Nursing), Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0009-4775-5471
Jingnan XueDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Luying QiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiuhua PengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Mei LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Yifeng ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Huzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Pengliang XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Hongxing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Jianping JiangDepartment of Cardiovascular Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning radiomics (DLR) nomogram for individualized CHD risk assessment in the COPD population. Methods: This retrospective study included 543 COPD patients from two different centers. Comprehensive clinical and imaging data were collected for all participants. In Center 1, 398 patients were randomly allocated into a training set and an internal validation set at a 7:3 ratio. An external test set was established using 145 patients from Center 2. Radiomics features were extracted from computed tomography (CT) images, and deep learning features were generated using ResNet50. By integrating traditional clinical data, radiomics features, and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning features, a combined predictive model was developed to estimate the risk of CHD in COPD patients. Results: Validation cohort AUCs revealed the nomogram's optimal predictive performance (Internal: 0.800; External: 0.761) compared to clinical (0.759, 0.661), radiomics (0.752, 0.666), and DLR (0.767, 0.732) models. This integrative approach demonstrated a 9.1% and 13.4% relative AUC improvement over clinical and radiomics models in external validation. DCA corroborated these findings, showing the nomogram provides the highest net benefit for clinical decision-making across probability thresholds in COPD patients at risk for CHD. Conclusion: The nomogram model, which integrates clinical, radiomics, and deep learning features, exhibits promising performance in predicting CHD risk among COPD patients. It may offer valuable insights for early intervention and management strategies for CHD.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseDecision Support TechniquesDeep LearningNomogramsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasecoronary heart diseasedeep learningnomogramradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40917929
PMCPMC12413852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.