ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Enhancing Neuroanatomy Education for Medical Students Through the Development of Online Modules.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimising pre-class tests to enhance student engagement in neuroanatomy: a pilot study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Neuroanatomy is a cornerstone of medical education, yet its complexity often leads to student apprehension, termed "neurophobia." This quantitative study evaluated the effectiveness of online Functional Neuroanatomy modules in enhancing second-year medical students' understanding of neuroanatomy at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar during the 2024-25 academic year. Participants and Methods: Four functional neuroanatomy modules were developed: Brainstem Anatomy, Sensory Pathway, Motor Pathway, and Cranial Nerves. Each module featured a 15 to 20-minute animated video and accompanying pre- and post-module quizzes. Each module included 5-10 multiple-choice questions and labeling exercises targeting structure, function, and clinical correlation relationships through distinct clinical scenarios. Thirty-six students participated in this study by completing one or more modules. A survey was administered at the end of the final module to assess student perceptions of the modules' effectiveness, utility, and overall satisfaction. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired samples t-tests to compare pre- and post-quiz performance and independent t-tests to compare weekly quiz scores between participants and non-participants. Results: Statistical analysis showed significant improvement in post-module quiz scores across all modules (p < 0.001), indicating short-term learning gains. No significant difference was observed in official weekly neuroanatomy quiz scores between participants and non-participants (p > 0.05), possibly attributable to students' already strong baseline performance and access to multiple learning resources. Survey responses reflected high satisfaction, with students praising the modules' clarity, interactivity, and flexibility. Conclusion: These findings support the effectiveness of neuroanatomy modules as a supplementary digital tool that enhances comprehension and addresses neurophobia. However, limitations, including small sample size, lack of long-term retention assessment, and reliance on quiz-based evaluation, warrant caution and suggest the need for more rigorous future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.