Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917783›Full record

ReviewOpen life sciences2025

Wound healing and signaling pathways.

Zhe Liu, Yudong Fang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Carbon nanotubes for wound healing: material design, mechanistic insights.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Cellular Senescence in Skin Wound Repair: Dual Roles and Senotherapeutic Interventions.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhe LiuShanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital, Department of Vascular Diseases, Shanghai University of TCM, No. 230, Baoding Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200082, China.
Yudong FangShanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital, Department of Vascular Diseases, Shanghai University of TCM, No. 230, Baoding Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200082, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a precisely regulated dynamic process in which signaling pathways play a central role. This article provides a comprehensive review of the signaling pathways involved in wound healing, emphasizing their roles in inflammation, vascular regeneration, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix remodeling. We further discuss the crosstalk between these pathways and their contributions to wound healing dysregulation. Finally, we explore emerging therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways, including small-molecule inhibitors, gene therapy, and biologics, summarizing their preclinical and clinical efficacy. By elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying wound healing and potential interventions, this review aims to provide valuable insights for future research and translational applications in wound healing.

Indexed as

crosstalksignaling pathwaytherapeutic strategieswound healing

Identifiers

PMID40917783
PMCPMC12412379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.