ArticleAnnals of neurosciences2025
Exploring Creativity Through the Eyes: A New Framework Using Rorschach Inkblot Test Metrics.
Article in Annals of neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Creativity involves the generation of novel ideas that are original and unique. It is a subjective process, and few studies are available in support of objective measures. Available tests of creativity are limited to questions related to an individual's trait and subjective responses. Though creativity is a divergent construct, an objective approach to computing and marking one as creative is required. This is so because creativity is an important factor for success, and a subjective approach would bring bias. Purpose: The present study aims to develop a creativity score using the Rorschach Inkblot Test (RIBT) and then test it with eye-tracking technology. Methods: Thirty-four university students were recruited for the study using a purposive sampling technique. RIBT cards were shown on a computer screen with an eye tracker mounted on it. Their responses were recorded and analysed to develop a novel construct of the Creativity measure. The Creativity score is then divided into high, medium and low creativity using the k-means clustering algorithm. Eye parameters of fixations, saccades and pupil diameter were explored for each group. Results: ANOVA revealed significant differences between the three groups. In the high-creativity group, fixation count, variations in pupil diameter and total saccadic duration were higher than their counterparts. Mean fixation duration was highest for the low-creativity group. Conclusion: The results indicated that using unstructured blots with Eye-tracking technology helps assess creativity objectively, further broadening avenues to measure creativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.