Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917636›Full record

ReviewEvolution, medicine, and public health2025

Evolutionary medicine of emunctory functions of the kidney: an empirical review.

Noel T Boaz, Robert L Chevalier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noel T BoazCenter for Evolutionary Medicine, Integrative Centers for Science and Medicine, Martinsville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-9437
Robert L ChevalierDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primitive emunctory functions to expel harmful substances from cells and the interstitial space of multicellular organisms evolved over the past billion and a half years into the complex physiology of the metanephric kidney. Integrative biology allows empirical testing of hypotheses of the origins of renal structures from homologous single-celled precursors. Emunctory cell complexes called nephridia evolved in metazoan (cnidarian) ancestors 750 million years ago (mya). The pronephric kidney was a metameric structure that evolved some 700 mya in early bilaterians to excrete waste products through nephridial slits in the body wall from head to tail. The mesonephric kidney evolved 635 mya when pharyngeal slits differentiated into filter-feeding gills and a heart-kidney evolved in later bilaterians. The mesonephric filtering glomeruli lost their external exits through the body wall and now drained through an internal mesonephric duct into the coelom. When chordates moved into fresh water from the sea 588 mya the high-pressure glomerulus evolved in the mesonephros, increasing water excretion. Tetrapods moved onto land losing the buoyancy of water. Blood pressure and glomerular filtration rose and the metanephric kidney evolved in amniotes. The high pressure-flow glomerulus predisposes podocytes to injury and detachment leading to sclerosis, whereas the high mitochondrial activity of the tubule contributes to susceptibility to ischemia, hypoxia, and oxidative injury. The kidney evolved a counter-current mechanism and urea cycle to optimize water retention. Perturbations in the complex development of the metanephric kidney, which parallels its phylogeny, explain many renal pathologies, which are traceable to these adaptations.

Indexed as

evolutionary-medicinekidneykidney-diseaserenal-evolution

Identifiers

PMID40917636
PMCPMC12409785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.