Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917631›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025

Cortical somatosensory responses evoked by orofacial skin stretch experimentally applied during speech movement planning in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.

Elise LeBovidge, Takayuki Ito, Ludo Max

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elise LeBovidgeUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Takayuki ItoUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, GIPSA-lab, Grenoble, France.
Ludo MaxUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Auditory prediction and error evaluation in the speech of individuals who stutterR01DC020162 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Ayoub Daliri · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Dynamic bidirectional sensorimotor interactions in stutteringR01DC017444 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAX, LUDO · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017444NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior findings indicate that individuals who stutter do not show the typical modulation of auditory processing that is observed during speech movement planning in nonstuttering speakers. We now ask whether this lack of planning-related sensory modulation in stuttering adults is specific to the auditory domain. In this first

Indexed as

Movement planningSensorimotor integrationSomatosensationSpeechStuttering

Identifiers

PMID40917631
PMCPMC12410527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.