Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917597›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025

Beliefs and perceived benefits and harms of perinatal cannabis use among pre- and post-pregnancy women.

Rebecca K Denson, Mayra Guerrero, William Bond, Anna Patterson, Gina May, Tamar Polatsek, Robin J Mermelstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca K DensonUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychology, United States.
Mayra GuerreroUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychology, United States.
William BondUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Department of Emergency Medicine, and Jump Simulation, an OSF HealthCare and University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria Collaboration, United States.
Anna PattersonUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, United States.
Gina MayUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychology, United States.
Tamar PolatsekUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychology, United States.
Robin J MermelsteinUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Department of Psychology, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cannabis use in pregnancy is increasing, despite evidence linking perinatal cannabis use (PCU) to maternal and infant health risks. To investigate factors contributing to increasing PCU, this study used qualitative interviews to examine beliefs and perceptions of PCU. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with pre- and post-pregnancy women examined beliefs and perceived benefits and harms of PCU. Interviews were transcribed and coded using a combined inductive/deductive approach. Thematic analysis identified themes related to beliefs, benefits, and harms associated with PCU. Results: Twenty participants (50 % Black/African-American, 50 % White, 10 % Hispanic/Latina, mean age = 29.8 years) completed the study. Participants held contradictory beliefs about the safety of PCU, expressing ideas about both safety and potential harms. Perceived harms included themes of harm to infant/fetus, harm to pregnant women, and route of administration. Although most (75 %) participants had heard of potential PCU-related harms, participants were unsure about the accuracy of this information. Only one participant experienced PCU-related harm during pregnancy. Almost all (90 %) participants perceived benefits of PCU; these centered on coping with mental health symptoms, alleviation of pregnancy-related symptoms, and improved parenting experiences. Participants felt cannabis was effective in relieving perinatal symptoms of anxiety, depression, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusions: Perceived benefits and perceptions that PCU is safe may underlie increasing prevalence. However, these beliefs and perceptions are nuanced, and may be influenced more by personal experience than information received about PCU risks. Education addressing pregnant women's desire for credible, evidence-based information on PCU is crucial to inform decision-making and mitigate potential risks.

Indexed as

BenefitCannabisPerinatalPregnancyRisk

Identifiers

PMID40917597
PMCPMC12410515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.