ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Preclinical validation of finite element models for predicting in vivo residual plate bending using continuous implant sensor data.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Specific Adaptation of a Mechano-Regulatory Bone-Healing Model Using Longitudinal Loading Data.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Integrating mechanistic research and emerging technologies to advance clinical translation in orthopaedics.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Refining predictive biomechanics for orthopedic healing.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Insights into predicting residual plate bending in vivo using sensor-informed finite element models.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- [Sensor-based monitoring of fracture healing].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objective: Plate failure, including bending, is a critical issue in orthopedic fracture fixation, with clinical failure rates of 3.5%-19%, burdening patients and healthcare systems. Preclinical ovine models have observed similar plate bending due to overloading. Finite element (FE) models could be capable of predicting failures but lack Methods: Tibiae of eleven sheep with osteotomy gaps (0.6 - 30 mm) were instrumented with stainless steel or titanium locking plates equipped with AO Fracture Monitors in a prior study. Residual plate bending angles were measured using co-registered CT scans at 0 and 4 weeks post-operation, with bending defined as ≥ 1°. Animal-specific FE models, incorporating virtual AO Fracture Monitors and non-linear implant material properties, were developed to determine sensor signals at the construct's yield point. Results: Within 4 weeks, plate bending angles ranged from 0.4° to 10.4°, with overloading bending observed in 6 animals. The FE methodology correctly predicted bending/no-bending outcomes in 9 of 11 animals, achieving 100% sensitivity and 60% specificity. Conclusions: This sensor-validated FE methodology robustly predicted The Translational Potential of this Article: This validated FE methodology, leveraging AO Fracture Monitor data, can be adapted for human use to tailor rehabilitation protocols immediately post-surgery and provide real-time feedback to patients and clinicians if loading exceeds safe thresholds. This approach could minimize implant failure, reduce revision surgeries, and enhance patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.