Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917518›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

Collagen-elastin dermal scaffolds enhance tissue regeneration and reduce scarring in preclinical models.

Roman Krymchenko, Nancy Avila-Martinez, Merel Gansevoort, Gert-Jan Bakker, Madalena L N P Gomes, Marcel Vlig, Elly M M Versteeg, Bouke K H L Boekema, Toin H van Kuppevelt, Willeke F Daamen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential of Heparan Sulphate Mimetics Integrated Into Collagen Scaffolds for Enhanced Skin Wound Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Roman KrymchenkoRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nancy Avila-MartinezRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Merel GansevoortRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Gert-Jan BakkerRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Madalena L N P GomesAlliance of Dutch Burn Care, Burn Research Lab, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Marcel VligAlliance of Dutch Burn Care, Burn Research Lab, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Elly M M VersteegRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Bouke K H L BoekemaAlliance of Dutch Burn Care, Burn Research Lab, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Toin H van KuppeveltRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Willeke F DaamenRadboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Department of Medical BioSciences, Geert Grooteplein 28, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe scarring is an inevitable consequence of large full-thickness skin wounds, often leading to long-term complications that affect patients' well-being and necessitate extended medical interventions. While autologous split-thickness skin grafts remain the clinical standard for wound treatment, they frequently result in contractures, excessive scarring, and the need for additional corrective procedures. To address these challenges, bioengineered skin substitutes capable of promoting efficient healing while reducing complications are highly desirable. Elastin, an essential component of the extracellular matrix, plays a crucial role in restoring tissue elasticity and regulating scar formation during wound healing. This study explores the impact of two distinct elastin-derived components, produced through acidic and basic hydrolysis, on wound repair. We developed and characterized collagen-based scaffolds enriched with these elastin hydrolysates and assessed their influence on different types of human skin fibroblasts, including fetal, eschar-derived, and healthy adult dermis-derived fibroblasts. Furthermore, we evaluated their therapeutic potential in a preclinical rat model. Our findings indicated that fetal fibroblasts exhibited the most pronounced extracellular matrix deposition and cellular infiltration within the scaffolds, followed by eschar fibroblasts and, lastly, healthy adult cells. The incorporation of elastin into collagen scaffolds led to a reduction in α-SMA protein expression, a biomarker of fibrosis, compared to collagen-only scaffolds. Notably, collagen scaffolds supplemented with elastin hydrolysate from basic hydrolysis demonstrated the most promising outcomes for scarless healing, characterized by minimal wound contraction, enhanced extracellular matrix formation, and increased neovascularization.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsElastic fibersIn vitroIn vivoRat modelSkin healing

Identifiers

PMID40917518
PMCPMC12408406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.