ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Reasons for low long-lasting insecticide-treated net use and repurposing: qualitative study from southern Ethiopia.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Where did the nets go? Tracing long-lasting insecticidal net migration on Bioko Island.Malaria journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the main vector control tools and remain protective against malaria, even in the presence of high pyrethroid resistance. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, the estimated percentage of the population sleeping under LLINs is low. Hence, this qualitative study was conducted to explore perceptions about LLINs and the reasons for low LLIN use in southern Ethiopia. Methods: Qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in southern Ethiopia. Study areas were selected based on low LLIN use following a quantitative survey. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) with a total of 52 discussants were conducted. Data were managed manually using Microsoft Word and were analyzed thematically. Results: The themes that emerged were ownership of LLINs, perceived lifespan of LLINs, uses of LLINs, reasons for LLIN non-use, and recommendations. Participants indicated low LLIN coverage and interrupted maintenance supply. The pattern of LLIN utilization varied between groups, as some said it was improving while others said it was decreasing. The expected life span of LLINs reported varied from a minimum of 3 months to a maximum of 3 years. Discussants from all FGDs described that the possibility of discarding or repurposing LLINs is high when it does not kill mosquitoes. Some discussants added the finding that ineffectiveness was worsened by exposing LLINs to direct sunlight to decrease suffocation. All FGD discussants agreed that the main reason for not using LLINs was a lack of awareness, which in turn caused negligence. Some groups in pastoralist areas added the perception that LLINs do not protect from malaria as a reason for non-use. Conclusion: The low LLIN use and high repurposing practices were noted due to different reasons, including low awareness, negligence, ineffectiveness of LLINs in killing mosquitoes, and others. LLINs are repurposed mainly for covering different things and making ties. Continuous awareness creation activities and corrective measures might improve LLIN coverage and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.