Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917414›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Long short-term memory-based forecasting of influenza epidemics using surveillance and meteorological data in Tokyo, Japan.

Daiki Koge, Keita Wagatsuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daiki Koge *Division of Bioinformatics, Department of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Keita Wagatsuma *Institute for Research Administration, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Influenza remains a significant public health challenge worldwide, necessitating robust forecasting models to facilitate timely interventions and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to develop a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based short-term forecasting model to accurately predict weekly influenza case counts in Tokyo, Japan. Method: By using weekly time-series data on influenza incidence in Tokyo from 2000 to 2019, along with meteorological variables, we developed four distinct models to evaluate the impact of the external variables of mean temperature, relative humidity, and national public holidays. After model training, we assessed the predictive performance on an independent test dataset, using mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: During the study period, 1,445,944 influenza cases were analyzed. The model incorporating all three external variables demonstrated superior predictive accuracy, with an MSE of 3,646,084, RMSE of 1,909, MAE of 849, and Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.924. These findings underscore the substantial contribution of these external factors to improving the prediction performance. Conclusion: This study highlighted the efficacy of LSTM-based models for short-term influenza forecasting and reinforces the importance of integrating meteorological variables and national public holidays into predictive frameworks. Our optimal model provided more precise forecasts of influenza activity in Tokyo, Japan.

Indexed as

EpidemicsInfluenza, HumanMeteorological ConceptsPopulation SurveillanceForecastingHumansIncidenceTokyoclimate changeepidemiologyforecastinginfluenzaJapanmeteorological factor

Identifiers

PMID40917414
PMCPMC12411156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.