ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2025
Toward a Comprehensive Anatomical Matrix for Crown Birds: Phylogenetic Insights from the Pectoral Girdle and Forelimb Skeleton.
Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Biologists and Aerospace Engineers: Important Allies to Explore the Secrets of Natural Flight.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative analysis of stem-palaeognath flight capabilities sheds light on ratite dispersal and flight loss.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phylogenetic analyses of phenotypic characters in crown-group birds often recover results that are strongly incongruous with the findings of recent phylogenomic analyses. Furthermore, existing morphological datasets for crown birds are frequently limited by restricted taxon or character sampling, inconsistent character construction, incorrect scoring, or a combination of several of these factors. As part of an effort to address these limitations, in this study we focus on identifying phylogenetically informative characters of the avian pectoral girdle and forelimb skeleton, elements of which are commonly preserved as avian fossils. We assembled and vetted a dataset of 203 characters, which were then scored for a phylogenetically diverse range of 75 extant avian taxa and incorporated into phylogenetic analyses. Analyses run without topological constraints exhibited notable conflicts with the results of recent phylogenomic studies, possibly due to functional convergence and rapid cladogenesis in the early evolutionary history of crown birds. Qualitative anatomical comparisons and quantitative metrics of homoplasy further highlighted the fact that similar morphologies in pectoral girdle and forelimb elements have evolved repeatedly in distantly related groups of birds, representing a major confounding factor in avian morphological phylogenetics. However, the implementation of molecular scaffolds allowed the identification of diagnostic character combinations for numerous avian clades previously only recognized through molecular data, such as Phaethontimorphae, Aequornithes, and Telluraves. Although large morphological datasets may not guarantee increased congruence with molecular phylogenetic studies, they can nonetheless be valuable tools for identifying anatomical synapomorphies of key clades, placing fossils into phylogenetic context, and studying macroevolutionary patterns within major groups of organisms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.