Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917309›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2025

Toward a Comprehensive Anatomical Matrix for Crown Birds: Phylogenetic Insights from the Pectoral Girdle and Forelimb Skeleton.

A Chen, E M Steell, R B J Benson, D J Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A ChenDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-9190
E M SteellDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3999-3500
R B J BensonAmerican Museum of Natural History, NY, NY 10024, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8244-6177
D J FieldDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses of phenotypic characters in crown-group birds often recover results that are strongly incongruous with the findings of recent phylogenomic analyses. Furthermore, existing morphological datasets for crown birds are frequently limited by restricted taxon or character sampling, inconsistent character construction, incorrect scoring, or a combination of several of these factors. As part of an effort to address these limitations, in this study we focus on identifying phylogenetically informative characters of the avian pectoral girdle and forelimb skeleton, elements of which are commonly preserved as avian fossils. We assembled and vetted a dataset of 203 characters, which were then scored for a phylogenetically diverse range of 75 extant avian taxa and incorporated into phylogenetic analyses. Analyses run without topological constraints exhibited notable conflicts with the results of recent phylogenomic studies, possibly due to functional convergence and rapid cladogenesis in the early evolutionary history of crown birds. Qualitative anatomical comparisons and quantitative metrics of homoplasy further highlighted the fact that similar morphologies in pectoral girdle and forelimb elements have evolved repeatedly in distantly related groups of birds, representing a major confounding factor in avian morphological phylogenetics. However, the implementation of molecular scaffolds allowed the identification of diagnostic character combinations for numerous avian clades previously only recognized through molecular data, such as Phaethontimorphae, Aequornithes, and Telluraves. Although large morphological datasets may not guarantee increased congruence with molecular phylogenetic studies, they can nonetheless be valuable tools for identifying anatomical synapomorphies of key clades, placing fossils into phylogenetic context, and studying macroevolutionary patterns within major groups of organisms.

Identifiers

PMID40917309
PMCPMC12409627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.