ArticleResources, conservation & recycling advances2025
Enabling and embedding circularity goals in housing cooperatives.
Article in Resources, conservation & recycling advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shifting towards a circular economy in the built environment is considered an important step toward fostering environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. Housing cooperatives, established to provide affordable and democratically governed housing, may offer structural advantages for embedding circularity - but their role in circular transitions remains underexplored. This study investigates how cooperative governance may influence the implementation of circular strategies, including circular design, product-service systems, and shared resource models, across different housing types. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with housing professionals, cooperative representatives, service providers, and policymakers, we assess the comparative institutional advantages and limitations of cooperatives in enabling circular transitions. Our findings indicate that housing cooperatives can mitigate market failures and overcome split incentives through collective ownership, long-term planning, and participatory governance. These features help facilitate lifecycle-based investments, bundled procurement, and shared infrastructure. However, cooperatives also face key challenges, including complex decision-making, limited access to finance, and regulatory barriers. This paper contributes to the understanding of alternative housing models for urban sustainability by offering insights into how cooperative-led initiatives can support circular innovation. It identifies boundary conditions for aligning stakeholder perspectives and embedding circular strategies within cooperative housing, helping to inform inclusive, community-based responses to climate and resource challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.