ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Validation of the adolescent menstrual poverty questionnaire.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Menstrual poverty is the inability to obtain menstrual products due to financial, social, cultural, and political barriers to accessing menstrual products. It affects 65% of adolescents in Nova Scotia, but its impact on adolescents in Canada remains unknown. The adolescent Menstrual Poverty Questionnaire (aMPQ) was designed to assess the impact of menstrual poverty on adolescents living in countries with higher socioeconomic status. This study aims to translate the aMPQ into French and to validate it in both English and French to facilitate nationwide use. Methods: The aMPQ was translated to French using forward translation by a professional translation service, then backward translation by a bilingual investigator. English and French speaking physicians specialized in adolescence care were recruited to participate in content validity assessment of the English and French aMPQs by completing a web-based survey containing rating scales from 1 to 4 on both clarity and relevance for each of the 27 items of the aMPQ. The Content Validity Index (CVI) for each Item (I-CVI) and for the general Scale (S-CVI) were calculated. An I-CVI of 0.78 or higher and an S-CVI of 0.90 or higher supports content validity. Results: Twelve physicians completed content validity surveys for the English and French aMPQ. Each question on the aMPQ had an I-CVI above 0.78 for both relevance and clarity. The S-CVI was 0.98. Conclusion: Content validity of the aMPQ in both English and French was established. The aMPQ is a valid bilingual tool and can be used for nationwide assessment of the impact of menstrual poverty on adolescents.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.