ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Association analysis between polygenic risk scores and traits: practical guidelines and tutorial with an illustrative data set of schizophrenia.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most methodological Polygenic Risk Score (PRS)-related papers explain the laborious process of computing the PRS in great depth. Afterwards, as a last step, it is generally described that to test a possible association between a PRS and a trait of interest, an analysis through regression models (linear or logistic, depending on data type) should be carried out adjusting for covariates (e.g., sex, age, clinical information, or genetic ancestry-based Principal Components). When covariates are included, measurements such as the increment on the variance explained by the addition of the PRS to the model or the significance of the PRS term are usually reported. However, the association study between PRSs and a trait is a complex concern that requires proper modeling and analysis, since interactions and validation conditions represent crucial aspects. Even though excellent papers explain how to use and interpret the results obtained with such regression models, sometimes important information from the previously calculated PRS may be lost, partly due to the automation of analyses. With this guide, we intend to fill a gap in association studies between PRSs and a trait and to facilitate the analysis, obtaining statistically correct results. It contains a motivating real data case analyzed exhaustively to illustrate how to face a real analysis. Besides, it is accompanied by four examples, called
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.