Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Association analysis between polygenic risk scores and traits: practical guidelines and tutorial with an illustrative data set of schizophrenia.

Itziar Irigoien, Patricia Mas-Bermejo, Sergi Papiol, Neus Barrantes-Vidal, Araceli Rosa, Concepción Arenas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Itziar IrigoienDepartment of Computation and Artificial Intelligence, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Donostia, Spain.
Patricia Mas-BermejoZoology and Biological Anthropology Section of the Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences Department, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Sergi PapiolCentre for Biomedical Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Neus Barrantes-VidalInstitut de Biomedicina de la UB (IBUB), Barcelona, Spain.
Araceli RosaZoology and Biological Anthropology Section of the Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences Department, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Concepción ArenasStatistics Section of the Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most methodological Polygenic Risk Score (PRS)-related papers explain the laborious process of computing the PRS in great depth. Afterwards, as a last step, it is generally described that to test a possible association between a PRS and a trait of interest, an analysis through regression models (linear or logistic, depending on data type) should be carried out adjusting for covariates (e.g., sex, age, clinical information, or genetic ancestry-based Principal Components). When covariates are included, measurements such as the increment on the variance explained by the addition of the PRS to the model or the significance of the PRS term are usually reported. However, the association study between PRSs and a trait is a complex concern that requires proper modeling and analysis, since interactions and validation conditions represent crucial aspects. Even though excellent papers explain how to use and interpret the results obtained with such regression models, sometimes important information from the previously calculated PRS may be lost, partly due to the automation of analyses. With this guide, we intend to fill a gap in association studies between PRSs and a trait and to facilitate the analysis, obtaining statistically correct results. It contains a motivating real data case analyzed exhaustively to illustrate how to face a real analysis. Besides, it is accompanied by four examples, called

Indexed as

covariatespolygenic risk scorepsychotic-like experiencesschizophreniastatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID40917249
PMCPMC12408642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.