Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917193›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

Social determinants of health and knowledge, attitude and practice studies on antimicrobial resistance-an evidence review and future direction.

Alison Shutt, Arunima Sehgal Mukherjee, Vrinda Nampoothiri, Alison Holmes, Esmita Charani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison ShuttNational Institute for Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College  London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-4900
Arunima Sehgal MukherjeeCentre for Sustainable Healthcare, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Vrinda NampoothiriDepartment of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Alison HolmesNational Institute for Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College  London, London, UK.
Esmita CharaniFaculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) intersects with social determinants of health (SDoH) influencing individual and population infectious disease exposure, spread and outcomes. A decade after the WHO recommended global AMR awareness campaigns to assess people's knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP), we reviewed existing KAP studies conducted among populations considered vulnerable, marginalized or deprived by SDoH indicators. Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of KAP studies from a broader systematic review that explored the intersection of SDoH, AMR, infections and vulnerable populations. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus for studies published in English between 2000 and 2022. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened, and qualitative analysis performed using thematic coding. Key findings were synthesized using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) framework. Results: Of the 126 papers included in the original review, 40 KAP studies met the inclusion criteria for this sub-analysis. Studies reported limited public knowledge about AMR and widespread practices of antibiotic self-medication. Existing recommendations emphasized continued health education. Although KAP studies describe 'what' antibiotic use behaviours are prevalent, they rarely address 'why' these behaviours occur-particularly in the context of SDoH and cultural norms. There is a pressing need to shift the research focus toward upstream drivers of behaviour, rather than solely on individual actions. Conclusions: Current KAP studies prioritize individual behaviours without adequately considering the broader social, structural and environmental determinants. While these upstream factors remain unaddressed, the practice of sub-optimal self-medication is likely to persist, despite ongoing education efforts.

Identifiers

PMID40917193
PMCPMC12409717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.