ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Social determinants of health and knowledge, attitude and practice studies on antimicrobial resistance-an evidence review and future direction.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) intersects with social determinants of health (SDoH) influencing individual and population infectious disease exposure, spread and outcomes. A decade after the WHO recommended global AMR awareness campaigns to assess people's knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP), we reviewed existing KAP studies conducted among populations considered vulnerable, marginalized or deprived by SDoH indicators. Methods: We conducted a sub-analysis of KAP studies from a broader systematic review that explored the intersection of SDoH, AMR, infections and vulnerable populations. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus for studies published in English between 2000 and 2022. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened, and qualitative analysis performed using thematic coding. Key findings were synthesized using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) framework. Results: Of the 126 papers included in the original review, 40 KAP studies met the inclusion criteria for this sub-analysis. Studies reported limited public knowledge about AMR and widespread practices of antibiotic self-medication. Existing recommendations emphasized continued health education. Although KAP studies describe 'what' antibiotic use behaviours are prevalent, they rarely address 'why' these behaviours occur-particularly in the context of SDoH and cultural norms. There is a pressing need to shift the research focus toward upstream drivers of behaviour, rather than solely on individual actions. Conclusions: Current KAP studies prioritize individual behaviours without adequately considering the broader social, structural and environmental determinants. While these upstream factors remain unaddressed, the practice of sub-optimal self-medication is likely to persist, despite ongoing education efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.