Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917191›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

Outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing catheter ablation for atrial arrhythmias.

Adrian M Petzl, Justice Oranefo, Alireza Oraii, Michael Riley, David Lin, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Robert D Schaller, Gregory E Supple, Timothy M Markman, Gustavo Guandalini and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Adrian M PetzlCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Justice OranefoCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alireza OraiiCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael RileyCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David LinCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ramanan KumareswaranCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert D SchallerCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gregory E SuppleCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Timothy M MarkmanCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gustavo GuandaliniCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Matthew C HymanCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David S FrankelCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Andrew E EpsteinCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Saman NazarianCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fermin C GarciaCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rajat DeoCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David J CallansCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Francis E MarchlinskiCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sanjay DixitCardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is characterized by atrial myopathy, which predisposes patients to atrial fibrillation (AF) and other atrial arrhythmias (AA). Although catheter ablation of AA is effective in the general population, its efficacy and safety in patients with CA remain unclear. Objective: The study aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients with CA undergoing catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter (TAFL) and left atrial (LA) arrhythmias and to assess the presence and influence of LA low-voltage areas (LVA) in the latter. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with CA undergoing first-time ablation for TAFL or LA arrhythmias (AF, atypical atrial flutter, and focal tachycardia). For the latter group, LA electroanatomical mapping (EAM) quantified LVA burden and distribution. The primary outcome was arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year. Additionally, long-term outcomes over the maximum follow-up period were assessed and correlated with LVA. Results: The cohort included 36 patients (TAFL in 11, LA arrhythmias in 25; mean age 74 ± 7 years, 81% men, 64% wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis). Recurrence of any AA after 1 year occurred in 10 patients (40%) after LA arrhythmia ablation and in 3 patients (28%) after TAFL ablation (all new AA). LVA was seen in 73% of patients undergoing LA arrhythmia, and it occupied 50.4% of the LA surface, most commonly the posterior wall (53%). However, its presence did not correlate with long-term arrhythmia-free survival ( Conclusion: Catheter ablation provides reasonable 1-year arrhythmia control in patients with CA experiencing TAFL or LA arrhythmias. However, long-term AA recurrence rates remain high.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationAtrial scarAtypical atrial flutterCardiac amyloidosisCatheter ablationElectroanatomic mappingPulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID40917191
PMCPMC12411953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.