ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Active esophageal cooling reduces peri-esophageal and vagal nerve injury in radiofrequency-current pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Damage to peri-esophageal tissue may occur following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Active esophageal cooling has been shown to reduce the incidence of mucosal esophageal injury, probably by dissipation of heat and inhibition of inflammation. Whether it also protects the peri-esophageal vagal nerve plexus and reduces gastric hypomotility and food retention is uncertain. Objective: The study aimed to analyze and compare the incidence of esophageal and vagal nerve injury following radiofrequency-current (RF) PVI with active esophageal cooling to that of luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring. Methods: Using endoscopy and electrogastrography, esophageal and peri-esophageal injury (mucosal lesions, food retention, and vagal nerve injury) were prospectively assessed following RF-PVI with active esophageal cooling and compared with RF-PVI with LET monitoring. Results: A total of 64 patients (69 [65/75] years, 58% men) undergoing RF-PVI for atrial fibrillation with esophageal cooling under (deep) conscious sedation were prospectively studied and compared with 52 LET-monitored patients.Following RF-PVI with active cooling, 4.7% had mucosal erythema, 15.6% new-onset food retention, and 14.1% ablation-induced vagal nerve injury. In comparison, the LET-monitored cohort showed 11.5% with mucosal esophageal lesions, 26.9% new-onset food retention, and 28.8% ablation-induced vagal nerve injury. The rate of any esophageal injury per patient was decreased by a factor of 0.51 ([95% confidence interval 0.30, 0.86]; Conclusion: In RF-PVI, active esophageal cooling reduces ablation-induced vagal nerve injury and overall peri-esophageal injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.