ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
First European experience with a leadless atrial pacemaker.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sub-Acute Re-Elevated Pacing Thresholds After Atrial Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Persistent sinus node dysfunction after biatrial heart transplantation successfully managed with CT-guided leadless atrial pacing: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Leadless Pacemakers in Complex Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Leadless pacemakers (LPs) can reduce long-term complications compared with conventional devices. However, previous studies have primarily focused on single chamber right ventricular LPs. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the implantation, safety, and device performance characteristics in a first real-world European use of an active fixation atrial LP for either dual chamber or single chamber pacing. Methods: For this prospective, single-center, single-operator analysis, we included consecutive patients undergoing implantation of an active fixation atrial LP either as a standalone therapy or as part of a dual chamber LP system. Results: Of the 45 included patients, 22 (48.9%) underwent de novo dual chamber, 9 (20%) an upgrade from ventricular single chamber to dual chamber, and 14 (31.1%) an atrial single chamber LP implantation. All implantations were successful and without the need for device repositioning. The median procedure time was 35 minutes (interquartile range 30-40), and complications occurred in 2 patients (4.4%) who developed pericardial effusions. Sensing, impedance, and stimulation thresholds of the atrial and ventricular device remained stable or improved over a median follow-up of 21 days. Median implant-to-implant throughput was 88% for atrial-to-ventricular and 87% for ventricular-to-atrial. The estimated median battery life of the atrial device was significantly higher in single chamber vs dual chamber settings (11.9 years vs 5.8 years, Conclusion: Our first real-world European experience demonstrates that leadless atrial pacemaker implantation can be performed efficiently and safely, with satisfactory device measurements during the early follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.