Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917155›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population.

Hayley Harman, Ashleigh A Pona, Lawrence Tabone, Salim Abunnaja, Nova Szoka, Stephanie Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hayley HarmanDepartment of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. (Drs. Harman, Tabone, Abunnaja, and Szoka).
Ashleigh A PonaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. (Dr. Pona).
Lawrence TaboneDepartment of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. (Drs. Harman, Tabone, Abunnaja, and Szoka).
Salim AbunnajaDepartment of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. (Drs. Harman, Tabone, Abunnaja, and Szoka).
Nova SzokaDepartment of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. (Drs. Harman, Tabone, Abunnaja, and Szoka).
Stephanie CoxDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. (Dr. Cox).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting. Methods: In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication. Results: Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as "very easy" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older. Conclusion: Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRural PopulationAdultAgedComputers, HandheldFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesWest VirginiaElectronic data captureMobile healthPatient-reported outcomesPreoperative evaluationQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40917155
PMCPMC12409709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.