ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Electronic Data Capture of Patient-Report Questionnaire in Patient Management in a Rural Population.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Electronic data capture may enhance efficiency and patient engagement in preoperative psychosocial evaluations for metabolic and bariatric surgery yet concerns persist about its feasibility in rural populations with historically lower mobile health adoption. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of electronic patient-reported outcomes among metabolic and bariatric surgery patients in a rural setting. Methods: In this quality improvement project, 202 patients undergoing presurgical psychosocial evaluation at an academic medical center in rural West Virginia completed a battery of psychological assessments on a clinic-provided tablet. Patients also completed a 9-item questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, and perceived impact on provider communication. Results: Most patients reported high satisfaction with the tablet-based format (85%), and nearly all (96%) preferred it over paper-and-pencil forms. Usability ratings were strong, with the majority describing the tablet as "very easy" to read (86%), use (84%), and navigate (87%). Notably, 42% reported the tablet encouraged them to discuss eating or mental health concerns with their provider, and 49% indicated it helped them remember prior symptoms. Only 4% preferred paper-and-pencil assessments, and these patients were significantly older. Conclusion: Tablet-based electronic patient-reported outcomes collection is a feasible and well-accepted method for presurgical psychosocial evaluations in rural metabolic and bariatric surgery patients. These findings challenge assumptions about digital hesitancy in rural populations and support broader implementation of electronic data capture in bariatric care workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.