ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025
Survey on sampling conditioned brain images and imaging measures with generative models.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative models have become innovative tools across various domains, including neuroscience, where they enable the synthesis of realistic brain imaging data that captures complex anatomical and functional patterns. These models, such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and diffusion models, leverage deep learning to generate high-quality brain images while maintaining biological and clinical relevance. These models address critical challenges in brain imaging, e.g., the high cost and time required for data acquisition and the frequent imbalance in datasets, particularly for rare diseases or specific population groups. By conditioning the generative process on variables such as age, sex, clinical phenotypes, or genetic factors, these models enhance dataset diversity and provide opportunities to study underrepresented scenarios, model disease progression, and perform controlled experiments that are otherwise infeasible. Additionally, synthetic data generated by these models offer a potential solution to data privacy concerns, as they provide realistic non-identifiable data. As generative models continue to develop, they hold significant potential to substantially advance neuroscience by augmenting datasets, improving diagnostic accuracy, and accelerating the development of personalized treatments. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the advancements in generative modeling techniques and their applications in brain imaging, with a particular emphasis on conditional generative methods. By categorizing existing approaches, addressing key challenges, and highlighting future directions, this paper aims to advance the integration of conditional generative models into neuroscience research and clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.