ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
Subsidence reduction effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with upper and lower open windows modified with lattice structure.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental quantification of resistance to subsidence conferred by endplate-specific expandable implants in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cage subsidence is a common complication following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) that can lead to poor clinical outcomes, including recurrent pain and segmental instability. Conventional TLIF cage designs often fail to distribute stress evenly, increasing the risk of endplate damage and subsequent subsidence. This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified TLIF cage with upper and lower open windows (lattice structure) in reducing cage subsidence in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD). A finite element (FE) model of the lumbar spine was developed and validated. Three TLIF cage designs (Open, Lattice, Closed) were simulated under various loading conditions (flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation), and von Mises stresses were analyzed within the TLIFs, endplates, and cancellous bone. The FE model demonstrated ROMs consistent with cadaveric studies. Elevated stresses were found in all cages, especially Open and Closed designs. The Lattice TLIF showed improved stress distribution, reducing peak stress on endplates. However, increased contact area had a limited effect on reducing subsidence under physiological loads. While contact area alone does not significantly mitigate subsidence risk, incorporating lattice structures may enhance resistance to physiological stress. These findings suggest that optimized TLIF designs integrating lattice structures can improve stability and reduce the likelihood of subsidence, leading to better clinical outcomes (e.g., reduced pain, improved fusion success, long-term stability) in LDDD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.