ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
A machine learning model for predicting the probability of hypothermia in trauma patients: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and verification of an early warning model for hypothermia in emergency trauma patients based on the random forest method.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypothermia, a component of the "lethal triad," commonly complicates the condition of critically injured trauma patients, thereby substantially elevating the risk of mortality. This study develop and evaluate a dynamic warning system based on non-invasive features, aimed at predicting the likelihood of hypothermia occurring in trauma patients within the next hour. 462 patients from the eICU database were selected on the basis of meeting the inclusion criteria, and 19 non-invasive and 17 invasive features were extracted. Five classic machine learning methods were employed to develop dynamic early warning model for hypothermia based on various observation windows, with multi-center data used for model validation. The shapley additive explanations (SHAP) algorithm was utilized to analyze the interpretability of the model, and ablation experiments were conducted to further evaluate the contribution of significant feature to the prediction performance. The AUC values of the optimal models based on non-invasive features in the same test set are 0.838. When using cross-hospital data as the validation set, the highest AUC values for the same models based on non-invasive features decrease by only 0.015. In addition, ablation experiments reveal that the model's AUC exhibited a 0.010 improvement when the three most influential invasive features were incorporated into the non-invasive feature set. The results show that machine learning models have shown significant potential in predicting hypothermia through the utilization of solely non-invasive features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.