ArticleTobacco induced diseases2025
Knowledge, perceptions, and usage patterns of nicotine pouches among Saudi medical students: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Nicotine dependence and self-esteem among respiratory therapy students in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Patterns and characteristics of nicotine pouch use among adults with a history of cigarette smoking.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The association between duration of nicotine pouch use and oral mucosal lesions in male dental students and interns: A cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Awareness, Perceptions, and Use of Oral Nicotine Pouches Among Jazan University Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTobacco smoking continues to pose a major global public health challenge. Medical students play a crucial role in shaping future smoking cessation practices. Nicotine pouches have recently emerged as a tobacco-free alternative with a potentially reduced harm profile. However, little is known about their use and perception among medical students in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess medical students' knowledge and perceptions of nicotine pouches and to examine usage patterns among those who consume these products.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between April and July 2024 among 295 medical students from three universities in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through a self-administered electronic questionnaire covering demographics, smoking history, knowledge, perceptions, and usage behaviors. Statistical analyses, including chi-squared tests and logistic regression, were used to identify factors associated with knowledge and usage.
resultsSmoking prevalence among participants was 16.3%, with significantly higher rates among males. Overall, 58.6% of students demonstrated good knowledge of nicotine pouches. Higher knowledge scores were associated with male gender, senior academic year, and higher grade point average (GPA). Among users, 62.9% reported quitting smoking, and more than half noted health improvements. The 10 mg nicotine strength was the most commonly used. Social influence, particularly peer pressure, was the primary reason for use. Despite noting harm reduction potential, students expressed concern about nicotine dependence and the need for stronger regulation.
conclusionsSaudi medical students show moderate knowledge of nicotine pouches, influenced by academic and demographic factors. However, concerns about dependence and regulation highlight the need for targeted education and policy development. Integrating this topic into medical curricula may better prepare future physicians to address nicotine use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.