ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Scrolling surgeons: Assessment of social media and artificial intelligence usage in gynecologic oncology fellows and fellowship programs.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current practices and perceptions of ChatGPT in gynecologic oncology: results from a cross-sectional questionnaire (TRSGO-AI-001).BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: This study examines gynecologic oncology fellows' perceptions and use of social media and artificial intelligence (AI) and their perception of virtual fellowship interviews. Methods: A cross-sectional, IRB-approved survey was distributed to fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited gynecologic oncology programs across the United States in December 2023. The survey collected demographic data and assessed social media engagement, AI utilization, and perceptions of their applicability in clinical, educational, and professional settings. Results: A total of 36 gynecologic oncology fellows participated. The majority reported using social media for personal purposes (62.5 % strongly agreed, 25.0 % agreed). However, 43.8 % agreed that they used social media for educational purposes, and a significant proportion (43.8 % disagreed, 25.0 % strongly disagreed) did not use social media to promote professional achievements. Most fellows recognized social media's role in patient engagement (50.0 % strongly agreed, 43.8 % agreed) and expressed a desire for more reliable patient-directed content (93.8 % strongly agreed or agreed). While 59.4 % believed social media was useful for fellowship recruitment, it had minimal impact on rank list decisions. Regarding AI, 53.1 % reported using AI tools such as ChatGPT for research (64.7 %) and professional writing (35.3 %), with limited use in patient care. Many fellows (47.1 % strongly agreed, 29.4 % agreed) expressed interest in formal AI training. Conclusions: Gynecologic oncology fellows primarily use social media for personal rather than professional purposes. AI is emerging as a research tool, though concerns persist regarding its application in patient care. Formal training in social media and AI could enhance fellows' ability to integrate these tools practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.