ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Clinical outcomes of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: Retrospective review from a large academic cancer centre.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Rare Cervical Tumors: IECC Classification, HPV Status, and Subtype-Directed Immunohistochemistry, with Treatment Outcomes from a Tertiary Center.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- When Immunophenotype Is Not Identity: A Clinicopathological Review of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Tumors of the Female Genital Tract.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Immunohistochemical profiling of PD-L1 expression in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas are a rare but aggressive malignancy associated with a poor prognosis and there is limited evidence to guide clinical decision-making. Our objective was to evaluate the patterns of practice and clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma between 2007 and 2023. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were extracted from the medical records and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: In total 32 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 14.5 months, and median age at diagnosis was 52 (range 21-89), 31.3 % (10/32) were stage IVB at time of diagnosis. Primary treatment consisted of surgery in 10 patients (31.3 %) and chemo-radiation in 15 patients (46.9 %), with the remainder of patients (7/32, 21.9 %) receiving upfront palliative therapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy typically consisted of a combination of cisplatin and etoposide. Median OS for the full cohort was 19 months (2-year OS 39 %, 2-year LR 9 %, 2-year LRR 9 %). Primary surgery was generally offered to patients with earlier stage disease (IA2-IIA1) relative to primary chemoradiotherapy (IB1-IVB). Patients treated with primary surgery had significantly higher median OS compared to those treated with primary chemoradiotherapy (39 vs 19 months, p = 0.04). Treatment failure usually consistent of distant metastatic relapse (15/20, 75 %). Conclusion: In our single institution review of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix, primary surgery was associated with improved OS; however, our sample size was small with a bias to offering upfront surgery to patients with earlier stage disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.