ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025
Do individuals with disorders of consciousness dream and mind wander? Implications for improving diagnosis and understanding patient wellbeing.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluctuations in the presence, experiential quality and contents of consciousness occur naturally during sleep and wakefulness and are core features of the healthy human mind. The purpose of this article is to consider the possibility that such fluctuations, including mind wandering and dreaming, which we refer to collectively as spontaneous thoughts and experiences (STE), may also be important elements of experience in certain patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). The presence of these states may have urgent implications for DoC diagnosis, which centres on the detection of consciousness. Furthermore, learning more about STE in DoC may provide insight into subjective experience and quality of life in DoC, about which little is currently known. Given the challenges that exist in studying conscious experience in this population, much of the evidence about STE we consider is indirect and involves triangulation from the healthy population and other brain-injured patients. The evidence we consider is inconclusive, but it indicates that the occurrence of mind wandering and dreaming in DoC is a real possibility that, because of its important implications in these patients, requires further research. We argue that, given the possible life-or-death consequences of diagnosis in DoC, it is of pressing importance to use diagnostic measures that are sensitive to these internally directed forms of conscious experience. We also consider some lines of research that may deepen our understanding of STE in DoC, and how further knowledge about these states may impact inferences about quality of life in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.