ArticleCancer medicine2025
Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Using the Baseline Clinical and Pathological Characteristics.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond pCR Prediction: Subtype-Specific Artificial Intelligence for Treatment Tailoring in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning for Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Using the Baseline Clinical and Pathological Characteristics.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become a vital prognostic indicator for patients with breast cancer (BC). The newly generated models depended on rather basic imaging and pathology characteristics and did not sufficiently elucidate the importance of the incorporated data. The purpose of this study is to establish and authenticate a machine learning model for predicting the pathological complete response to NAC using baseline clinical and pathological features in BC patients.
methodsData were collected from hospitalized BC patients treated with NAC at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between January 2014 and August 2023. The dataset was randomly split, with 70% allocated for model training and 30% for validation. LASSO regression was used to select predictive features. Six ML models-XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, logistic regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM)-were developed, with performance assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and Brier score. Clinical benefits were evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was applied to interpret the features of the optimal ML model.
resultsA total of 303 bc patients treated with NAC were included, with a pCR rate of 29.37% (89/303). Twelve features, such as age, menopausal status, PR, HER2 status, Ki-67 expression, stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) et al., were selected for model construction. Among the six models, the CatBoost model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an AUC of 0.853 after Bayesian hyperparameter tuning. SHAP analysis ranked sTILs as the most critical predictive feature. In fivefold cross-validation, the CatBoost model incorporating sTILs achieved an average AUC of 0.83.
conclusionsThe ML-based pCR prediction model enables more accurate pCR prediction for BC patients at baseline, aiding in optimizing treatment strategies. Additionally, the interpretable SHAP framework enhances model transparency, fostering clinical trust, and understanding among doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.