Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916991›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2026

Reflecting on LLM Support in Reflexive Thematic Analysis: An Exploratory Study.

Magnhild Vikan, Ramtin Aryan, Mari Serine Kannelønning, Michael Alexander Riegler, Stein Ove Danielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magnhild VikanDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6630-403X
Ramtin AryanDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Division Organization and Infrastructure, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Mari Serine KannelønningThe University Library, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Michael Alexander RieglerSimula Cyber Security, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.
Stein Ove DanielsenDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The launch of ChatGPT in November 2022 accelerated discussions and research into whether base large language models (LLMs) could increase the efficiency of qualitative analysis phases or even replace qualitative researchers. Reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) is a commonly used method for qualitative text analysis that emphasizes the researcher's subjectivity and reflexivity to enable a situated, in-depth understanding of knowledge generation. Researchers appear optimistic about the potential of LLMs in qualitative research; however, questions remain about whether base models can meaningfully contribute to the interpretation and abstraction of a dataset. The primary objective of this study was to explore how LLMs may support an RTA of an interview text from health science research. Secondary objectives included identifying recommended prompt strategies for similar studies, highlighting potential weaknesses or challenges, and fostering engagement among qualitative researchers regarding these threats and possibilities. We provided the interview file to an offline LLM and conducted a series of tests aligned with the phases of RTA. Insights from each test guided refinements to the next and contributed to the development of a recommended prompt strategy. At this stage, base LLMs provide limited support and do not increase the efficiency of RTA. At best, LLMs may identify gaps in the researchers' perspectives. Realizing the potential of LLMs to inspire broader discussion and deeper reflections requires a well-defined strategy and the avoidance of misleading prompts, self-referential responses, misguiding translations, and errors. Conclusively, high-quality RTA requires a human, comprehensive familiarization phase, and methodological competence to preserve epistemological integrity.

Indexed as

LanguageQualitative ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicResearch Designartificial intelligenceexploratory studyhealth sciencelarge language modelqualitative analysisreflexive thematic analysisreflexivity

Identifiers

PMID40916991
PMCPMC12949038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.