ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Exploring Heterogeneity in Vestibular Migraine Using Individualized Differential Structural Covariance Network Analysis.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rimegepant for vestibular and cochlear symptoms associated with vertigo in a real-world retrospective study.iScience · 2026Article
- Functional Brain Connectivity Patterns of Headache-Mental Disorder Comorbidity in Patients With Migraine.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Exploring Heterogeneity in Vestibular Migraine Using Individualized Differential Structural Covariance Network Analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe high heterogeneity in vestibular migraine (VM) complicates understanding its precise pathophysiological mechanisms and identifying potential biomarkers. This study investigated the heterogeneity in VM using a newly proposed method called Individualized Differential Structural Covariance Network (IDSCN) analysis.
methodsStructural T1-weighted MRI scans were performed on 55 patients with VM and 65 healthy controls, and an IDSCN was constructed for each patient. We studied the extent of heterogeneity in the IDSCNs, summarized the distribution of differential edges, and clustered the patients into subtypes with the shared differential edges. Imaging-clinical association analyses were conducted on both the subtype classification and the differential edges exhibiting significant inter-subtype differences.
resultsPatients with VM demonstrated notable heterogeneity in the number of significantly altered IDSCN edges, while sharing several common differential connections that were mainly distributed among the parietal, subcortical, and cerebellar regions. Two robust and distinct neuroanatomical subtypes of VM were identified, which were associated with headache frequency. The differential edge between the left paracentral lobule and right pallidum was associated with both headache frequency and occurrence.
conclusionsThese findings indicate the importance of considering individual differences in VM research and may offer insights for precise diagnosis and individualized treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.