Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916931›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Benchmarking Ploidy Estimation Methods for Bulk and Single-Cell Whole Genome Sequencing.

Yawei Song, Zilv Mei, Qijie Zheng, Qingqing Yuan, Yu Liang, Jiaqi Gao, Lang Zhou, Shuheng Wu, Wei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Benchmarking Ploidy Estimation Methods for Bulk and Single-Cell Whole Genome Sequencing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yawei SongKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Zilv MeiKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Qijie ZhengKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Qingqing YuanKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Yu LiangKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Jiaqi GaoKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Lang ZhouKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Shuheng WuKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Wei WuKey Laboratory of Multi-Cell Systems, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-2765

Funding

International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences Grant 318GJHZ2023004MINational Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFA1103900National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370575Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (Genome Tagging Project)Shanghai Rising-Star Program 24QA2710100State Key Laboratory of Epigenetic Regulation and InterventionStrategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Science XDB0990000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining cellular ploidy is critical for normal physiological processes, although gains in ploidy are frequently observed during development, tissue regeneration, and metabolism, and potentially contribute to aneuploidy, thereby promoting tumor evolution. Although numerous computational tools have been developed to estimate cellular ploidy from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data at bulk or single-cell resolution, to the knowledge, no systematic comparison of their performance has been conducted. Here, a benchmarking study is presented of 11 methods for bulk WGS and 8 methods for single-cell WGS data, utilizing both experimental and simulated datasets derived from diploid cells mixed with aneuploid or polyploid cells. For bulk WGS tools, their performance is evaluated in estimating tumor purity and ploidy, as well as the influence of preprocessing steps, somatic mutation callers, purity, sequencing platforms, and depths. It is found that PURPLE outperforms other methods when tumor purity exceeded 30%, regardless of sequencing coverage or platform. However, all existing tools performed poorly applied to euploid samples or long-read sequencing data. For single-cell WGS tools, their ploidy detection accuracy is assessed, and SeCNV is identified as the top-performing method. These findings provide valuable guidance for future research on ploidy analysis and ongoing improvements in computational tools for single-cell sequencing data.

Indexed as

PloidiesSingle-Cell AnalysisWhole Genome SequencingBenchmarkingComputational BiologyHumansNeoplasmsaneuploidyploidy estimationsingle‐cell DNA sequencingtumor puritywhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40916931
PMCPMC12677682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.