Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916803›Full record

ReviewClinical transplantation and research2025

Donor-derived cell-free DNA in solid organ transplantation: analytical considerations, diagnostic performance, and clinical interpretation.

Hyunhye Kang, Sang-Ik Cho, Eun-Jee Oh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyunhye KangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1338-6451
Sang-Ik ChoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0286-6664
Eun-Jee OhDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-915X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has emerged as a valuable noninvasive biomarker for detecting allograft injury in solid organ transplantation. It is released into the bloodstream from the transplanted organ as a result of cell injury and immune activation, with baseline levels influenced by organ type, tissue turnover, and posttransplant physiological changes. Several analytical platforms are available, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), digital droplet PCR, and next-generation sequencing, each differing in sensitivity, throughput, and reporting format. Commercial assays have been clinically validated across multiple organs. dd-cfDNA can be quantified as a percentage of total cell-free DNA or as an absolute concentration, with diagnostic thresholds varying by platform and organ type. Although dd-cfDNA demonstrates high negative predictive value and can reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies, it is not specific to rejection and may be elevated in the setting of infection, ischemia, or inflammation. Preanalytical and technical factors can also affect test performance. Therefore, dd-cfDNA should be interpreted with careful consideration of biological variation, assay characteristics, and the patient's clinical context. Future efforts should focus on defining organ-specific thresholds, improving interlaboratory standardization, expanding validation in underrepresented graft types, and assessing cost-effectiveness and clinical impact to support broader clinical adoption.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCell-free DNADonor-derivedRejectionTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40916803
PMCPMC12521848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.