Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916731›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2025

The Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assay Landscape in Queensland, Australia: An Analysis of Use, Indications and Integration.

Akmez Latona, Samantha Lennard, Mark Rane, James Winearls, Biswadev Mitra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From single to dual platelet inhibition FIBTEM assay: fibrinogen replacement thresholds for critical bleeding after trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Multicenter survey on viscoelastic assays access and use in trauma in Swiss emergency departments.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akmez LatonaEmergency Department, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4275-2588
Samantha LennardCentral Laboratory, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Mark RaneCentral Laboratory, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
James WinearlsIntensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Biswadev MitraSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-2450

Funding

Emergency Medicine Foundation 233R38-2022-LATONA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViscoelastic haemostatic assays (VHAs) guide transfusion decisions in bleeding patients. We assessed testing volumes, clinical indications and patient characteristics in a statewide population in Australia.

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients who underwent rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) or thromboelastography (TEG) across Queensland Health hospitals (1 January 2019 to 15 April 2025), using data from AUSLAB, the statewide laboratory information system and surveyed all hospitals for VHA device availability.

resultOf 39 VHA devices, 31 were transmitting to AUSLAB, with 43,220 tests performed in 21,178 patients, during 18,389 admissions and 6418 ED presentations; 92.0% were ROTEM (n = 39,776) and 8.0% TEG (n = 3444). Most tests occurred during inpatient care (n = 35,527, 82.2%) versus ED (n = 7693, 17.8%). Indications included trauma (n = 23,875, 55.2%), non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 4238, 9.8%), obstetrics (n = 3307, 7.7%) and chronic liver disease (CLD) (n = 3853, 8.9%), including 1097 (2.5%) with variceal bleeding. Emergency department (ED) use increased overall (IRR 1.14; 95% CI 1.12-1.15), including trauma (IRR 1.15), CLD (1.16), variceal bleeding (1.12) and non-variceal bleeding (1.12) (all p < 0.001); obstetric use in ED did not change significantly (IRR 0.93; 95% CI 0.86-1.00). Inpatient use also increased (IRR 1.21; 95% CI 1.21-1.22), including trauma (IRR 1.22), CLD (1.16), variceal (1.10), non-variceal bleeding (1.17) and obstetrics (1.07) (all p < 0.001).

conclusionVHA use increased in both ED and inpatient settings, with prominent use in trauma and CLD. The results indicate growing recognition by clinicians of VHA's value in guiding haemorrhage management. The need for a consistent, evidence-based approach to testing and interpretation of results is paramount.

Indexed as

HemorrhageThrombelastographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQueenslandRetrospective Studieshaemorrhagerotational thromboelastometrythromboelastographytransfusionviscoelastic haemostatic assay

Identifiers

PMID40916731
PMCPMC12415669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.