ArticleBJPsych open2025
A different lens on diagnosis: value of the CFI in asylum seekers' psychiatric diagnostic assessment.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cultural psychiatry in Flanders, Belgium: an exploratory focus group study and position statement.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsylum seekers face significant mental health challenges but underutilise mental health services and are at increased risk of misdiagnosis. The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) could be helpful by introducing individuals' culture and context to psychiatric evaluation. However, its impact on the diagnostic process for asylum seekers remains underexplored.
aimsThis study aims to evaluate the added value of the CFI in the psychiatric diagnostic assessment of asylum seekers.
methodA mixed-methods design was applied. Diagnostic shifts from the CFI were quantitatively described in 63 participating asylum seekers. The CFI's value was explored using qualitative content analysis.
resultsIn about a third of cases, diagnoses were either confirmed (34.9%), changed (25.4%) or narrowed (33.3%), with notable shifts from depressive and psychotic disorders to either trauma- and stressor-related disorders or no psychopathology. Qualitative analysis revealed that the CFI enhanced understanding of participants' experiences, including the impact of trauma, migration and social context. It provided insights into their strengths and therapeutic needs. The shift towards stress-related diagnoses and away from other common DSM categories reflects the CFI's ability to provide a more nuanced, contextual understanding of asylum seekers' mental health.
conclusionThis study underscored the CFI as a valuable tool in asylum seekers' diagnostic assessment. The CFI facilitated a shift towards a more holistic, recovery-oriented approach. It prompted conceptual reflections on psychopathology in asylum seekers. The CFI presents a promising yet underutilised tool for addressing diagnostic challenges in cross-cultural settings. The findings highlight its potential for broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.