ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Successful Identification and Treatment of Cancer of Unknown Primary Originating From Gastric Cancer Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Case Report.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a challenging malignancy characterized by metastatic tumors with an unidentified primary site, even after extensive pathological and radiographic evaluation. Recent advancements in gene expression profiling and comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled the identification of potential tissue origins, thereby facilitating personalized treatment strategies. Although most cases of CUP present as adenocarcinomas or poorly differentiated tumors, the treatment remains largely empirical, with limited success from molecularly tailored therapies. However, advances in tumor DNA sequencing and targeted therapies hold great promise for enhancing patient outcomes. CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented with epigastric pain and was diagnosed with a duodenal tumor and gastric ulceration via esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A histological evaluation revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the duodenum, and the immunohistochemistry findings supported a pancreatobiliary origin. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma in the duodenum, while a subsequent gastric examination revealed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, suggesting dual malignancies. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by pancreatoduodenectomy with distal gastrectomy. The CUP was staged as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (pStage IVB), while the gastric cancer was staged as well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (pStage IA). Despite adjuvant TS-1 therapy, lymph node metastasis near the superior mesenteric artery continued to progress. CGP revealed high microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden, along with multiple actionable genetic mutations. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was initiated, leading to complete remission, with no recurrence observed at 1 year after treatment cessation. Genetic and immunohistochemical investigations have identified microsatellite instability in both CUP and gastric cancer tissues, suggesting a shared origin. Targeted gene sequencing confirmed common genetic variations, ultimately revealing that the CUP originated from gastric cancer cells.
conclusionThis case highlights the critical role of CGP in the diagnosis and treatment of CUP. The use of advanced molecular techniques, including NGS, revealed the gastric origin of CUP and identified actionable biomarkers, leading to successful treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.