ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Equivalency Between the Generalized Bivariate Bernoulli Model Dependency Test and a Logistic Regression Model With Interaction Effects.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBinary endpoints measured at two timepoints-such as pre- and post-treatment-are common in biomedical and healthcare research. The Generalized Bivariate Bernoulli Model (GBBM) provides a specialized framework for analyzing such bivariate binary data, allowing for formal tests of covariate-dependent associations conditional on baseline outcomes. Despite its potential utility, the GBBM remains underutilized due to the lack of direct implementation in standard statistical software. Moreover, we contend that the comparison made in the original publication between the GBBM dependency test and the regressive logistic regression model has shortcomings and does not provide an ideal basis for evaluating the model's performance.
methodsIn this paper, we propose a standard logistic regression model with an interaction term and demonstrate that it yields an equivalent dependency test to the GBBM approach. This equivalence is established conceptually, theoretically, and empirically. Extensive simulations compared the power of the GBBM dependency test with: (a) dependency test from the regressive logistic model; (b) test derived from the logistic regression model with interaction; and (c) the Pearson Chi-square test. We also applied these methods to infant mortality data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS).
resultsThe power of the GBBM dependency test differs from the regressive logistic regression model used as a benchmark in the original paper that introduced the GBBM methodology. In contrast, the power and type 1-error rate of the GBBM dependency test and the logistic regression model with interaction described herein are equivalent across varying effect sizes and sample sizes.
conclusionOur work reveals that a widely available and flexible logistic regression model can serve as a practical alternative to the GBBM dependency test, enhancing accessibility for researchers. Moreover, this approach provides a foundation for extending dependency analyses to more complex longitudinal binary data structures, broadening its applicability in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.