ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025
In-Hospital Outcomes of Simultaneous and Staged Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in a Patient With Peripheral Artery Disease Requiring Surgical Vascular Access: A Case Report.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair-The First Case in Serbia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- In-Hospital Outcomes of Simultaneous and Staged Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with aortic aneurysms are at elevated risk of rupture, dissection and death during and after transcatheter aortic valve repair (TAVR), often requiring consideration for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) at the time of TAVR. However, data comparing outcomes of simultaneous versus staged TAVR-EVAR are limited.
methodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample between the years 2018 and 2021, we compared in-hospital outcomes of simultaneous and staged TAVR-EVAR. Patients who underwent both TAVR and EVAR during hospital admission were identified with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision procedure codes. Patients were stratified by simultaneous (defined as same day) versus staged (defined as different day) procedures. Propensity score matching was done in a 2:1 fashion to account for differences in baseline characteristics, and mixed effects multivariate regression models were used to assess differences in in-hospital mortality, cost of hospitalization, length of stay, and other procedural complications.
resultsA total of 270 patients underwent simultaneous TAVR-EVAR, while a total of 70 underwent staged TAVR-EVAR. After propensity score matching, 98 patients undergoing simultaneous TAVR-EVAR were matched to 49 patients undergoing staged TAVR-EVAR. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed after matching. In-hospital mortality between the matched groups was not significantly different (OR 0.67, p = 0.409), however the simultaneous group was associated with shorter length of stay (3 [2.0-11.75] days vs. 14 [13.0-17.0] days, p < 0.001) and less total hospital costs ($77,691 [$65,153-$103,854] vs. $148,617 [$128,339-$217,988]; p < 0.001). The matched simultaneous group was also associated with lower incidence of acute kidney injury (25.5% vs. 65.3%; OR 0.11, p < 0.001), blood transfusions (20.4% vs. 40.8%; OR 0.37, p = 0.01), and access site complications (< 10.2% vs. 49.0%; OR 0.00, p < 0.001).
conclusionSimultaneous TAVR-EVAR is associated with fewer adverse complications and lower cost of hospitalization without increased in-hospital mortality, suggesting it is more cost effective than staged TAVR-EVAR during the same hospital admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.