ArticleGenetics2026
A model-free method for genealogical inference without phasing and its application for topology weighting.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- ERICA-trio: an outgroup-free deep learning method for topology inference and introgression detection.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the mosaic genome of sugarcane cultivars through polyploid admixture inference with AdmixPoly.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Multiple Origins of a Sex Ratio Supergene in Formica Ants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- PolyAdapt: Characterizing Polygenic Adaptive Architectures in the Presence of Strong Linkage Disequilibrium.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Pandemic-Scale Ancestral Recombination Graph for SARS-CoV-2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in methods to infer and analyze ancestral recombination graphs (ARGs) are providing powerful new insights in evolutionary biology and beyond. Existing inference approaches tend to be designed for use with fully phased datasets, and some rely on model assumptions about demography and recombination rate. Here I describe a simple model-free approach for genealogical inference along the genome from unphased genotype data called Sequential Tree Inference by Collecting Compatible Sites (sticcs). sticcs applies a heuristic algorithm based on the perfect phylogeny principle to reconstruct a local genealogy at each variant site in the genome, using a "collecting" procedure to import information from other nearby sites. Using simulations, I show that sticcs is accurate for ARG inference, but only when the sample size is small. However, I also describe how it can be applied for the purpose of topology weighting by "stacking" tree sequences inferred for multiple subsets of the data, removing the sample size restriction. Topology weights estimated in this way from unphased data tend to be more accurate than those computed with full ARGs inferred from perfectly phased data using several popular tools. The methods presented therefore have promise for analysis of relatedness and introgression in nonmodel species, including polyploids. The new methods are implemented in 2 Python packages, sticcs (for ARG inference) and twisst2 (for topology weighting using the stacking procedure), both of which interface with the tskit library for analysis of tree sequence objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.