ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Real-world treatment patterns of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma in a community oncology setting.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Zanubrutinib in B-cell lymphomas: from clinical pharmacology to therapeutic application.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study examines United States real-world Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) treatment patterns, duration, and adherence in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients. MATERIALS &
methodsA retrospective analysis of electronic medical records for patients with MCL who initiated a BTKi between January 2019 and November 2021 was conducted. Patients were followed ≥ 6 months, examining baseline characteristics and outcomes including treatment duration and adherence.
results402 patients initiated acalabrutinib (n = 161), ibrutinib (n = 197), or zanubrutinib (n = 44). The zanubrutinib group demonstrated significantly longer median treatment duration (292 days) compared with acalabrutinib (259 days) and ibrutinib (149 days;
conclusionsIn this study, zanubrutinib group experienced significantly longer treatment durations and higher adherence compared with the acalabrutinib and ibrutinib groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.