Trial reportKorean journal of medical education2025
The effect of immersive simulation-based learning on an anatomy program in nursing education: a quasi-experimental study.
Trial report in Korean journal of medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study explores how immersive simulation-based learning affects nursing students' engagement, motivation, satisfaction, self-confidence, and knowledge gains in anatomy education.
methodsA quasi-experimental study was carried out from January to February 2025 among nursing students. A total of 76 participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: an experimental group receiving immersive simulation (n=38) and a control group following traditional instruction (n=38). A pre- and post-intervention test framework was implemented to evaluate changes in student engagement, motivation, satisfaction, self-confidence, and knowledge acquisition. Data analysis was done through non-parametric tests, specifically the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with IBM SPSS.
resultsThe immersive simulation group demonstrated significant improvements in motivation (Z=-4.407, p<0.001), engagement (Z=-3.555, p<0.001), knowledge acquisition (Z=-3.213, p=0.001), and self-confidence (Z=-2.054, p=0.040) compared to the traditional method group. Nevertheless, the difference in learning satisfaction between the two groups was not statistically significant (Z=-1.660, p=0.097).
conclusionThese findings indicate that immersive simulation has a positive effect on nursing students' motivation, engagement, self-confidence, and knowledge acquisition. While satisfaction levels were comparable between groups, immersive simulation presents a valuable complement to traditional teaching methods and may help address educational challenges in healthcare training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.