ReviewDiagnostic and prognostic research2025
Predicting venous thromboembolism among hospitalized adults: a protocol for development and validation of an implementable real-time prognostic model.
Review in Diagnostic and prognostic research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized adults. Numerous prognostic models have been developed to identify those patients with elevated risk of HA-VTE. None, however, has met the necessary criteria to guide clinical decision-making. This study outlines a protocol for refining and validating a general-purpose prognostic model for HA-VTE, designed for real-time automation within the electronic health record (EHR) system.
methodsA retrospective cohort of 132,561 inpatient encounters (89,586 individual patients) at a large academic medical center will be collected, along with clinical and demographic data available as part of routine care. Data for temporal, geographic, and domain external validation cohorts will also be collected. Logistic regression will be used to predict occurrence of HA-VTE during an inpatient encounter. Variables considered for model inclusion will be based on prior demonstrated association with HA-VTE and their availability in both retrospective EHR data and routine clinical care. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with tenfold cross-validation will be used for initial variable selection. Variables selected by the LASSO procedure, along with those deemed necessary by clinicians, will be used in an unpenalized multivariable logistic regression model. Discrimination and calibration will be reported for the derivation and validation cohorts. Discrimination will be measured using Harrell's C statistic. Calibration will be measured using calibration intercept, calibration slope, Brier score, integrated calibration index, and visual examination of non-linear calibration curve. Model reporting will adhere to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines for clinical prediction models using machine learning methods (TRIPOD + AI). DISCUSSION: We describe methods for developing, evaluating, and validating a prognostic model for HA-VTE using routinely collected EHR data. By combining best practices in statistical development and validation, knowledge engineering, and clinical domain knowledge, the resulting model should be well suited for real-time clinical implementation. Although this protocol describes our development of a model for HA-VTE, the general approach can be applied to other clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.