Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40915652›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdelrahman G Tawfik, Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras, Guilherme Del Fiol, Kensaku Kawamoto, Katy E Trinkley, Thomas Reese, Aubrey Jones, Daniel C Malone

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdelrahman G TawfikDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-9353
Ainhoa Gomez-LumbrerasDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3916-0402
Guilherme Del FiolDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-6799
Kensaku KawamotoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4282-9338
Katy E TrinkleySchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-7404
Thomas ReeseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1081-1670
Aubrey JonesDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Daniel C MaloneDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-9394

Funding

Personalizing Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Treatment to Clinicians' NeedsK23HL161352 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katy E Trinkley · 2022 to 2026
$869k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS029300NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL161352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain and inflammation but are associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. While this risk is well established, most studies evaluate NSAIDs as a homogenous class, limiting clinical decision-making based on individual agent safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of GI bleeding associated with individual NSAIDs. We searched PubMed from inception through January 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms for "gastrointestinal bleeding" and nine commonly used NSAIDs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for GI bleeding, with hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) treated as approximations of ORs due to the rare event nature of GI bleeding. Of 6,711 records screened, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome ascertainment was observed. Celecoxib was associated with the lowest risk of GI bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61). Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen had the lowest significant risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03), while ketorolac showed the highest risk (OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34). Other agents, such as piroxicam and meloxicam, also demonstrated significantly elevated risks. The risk of GI bleeding varies widely among individual NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to have the lowest GI risk, though cardiovascular safety must also be considered. These findings highlight the need for personalized NSAID selection and suggest that NSAIDs should not be treated as a uniform class when assessing bleeding risk.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID40915652
PMCPMC12746519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.