SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The analgesic effect and mechanism of celastrol in formalin-induced inflammatory pain mouse model.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response modelling of firsekibart (GenSci048) in patients with acute gout flare: Implications for fixed-dose optimization.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Ethanol as a Modifier of Drug Toxicity in Humans: Pathways of Toxicity and Organ-Level Consequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Integrated network pharmacology, molecular simulations, biophysical validation, and experimental validation to reveal the pharmacological effects and targets of Senkyunolide A against inflammation and oxidative stress.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Identification of Novel Anti-Inflammatory Peptides from JellyfishMarine drugs · 2026Article
- Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Tetrahydroindazole-Based Sulfonamides as Potential Multi-Target Anti-Inflammatory Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dexamethasone and N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of post-embolization syndrome following transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Psychological stress and gut microbiota regulation of osteoarthritis progression: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain and inflammation but are associated with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. While this risk is well established, most studies evaluate NSAIDs as a homogenous class, limiting clinical decision-making based on individual agent safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of GI bleeding associated with individual NSAIDs. We searched PubMed from inception through January 2025 using MeSH and free-text terms for "gastrointestinal bleeding" and nine commonly used NSAIDs. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for GI bleeding, with hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) treated as approximations of ORs due to the rare event nature of GI bleeding. Of 6,711 records screened, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in study design, populations, and outcome ascertainment was observed. Celecoxib was associated with the lowest risk of GI bleeding (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.84-1.61). Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen had the lowest significant risk (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.71-3.03), while ketorolac showed the highest risk (OR 20.67, 95% CI: 14.56-29.34). Other agents, such as piroxicam and meloxicam, also demonstrated significantly elevated risks. The risk of GI bleeding varies widely among individual NSAIDs. Celecoxib appears to have the lowest GI risk, though cardiovascular safety must also be considered. These findings highlight the need for personalized NSAID selection and suggest that NSAIDs should not be treated as a uniform class when assessing bleeding risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.