Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40915645›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Enhanced recovery following neck of femur fractures - improving outcomes : a survey of current perioperative practice.

Abbas See, Lauren A Taylor, Katie E Rollins, David W Hewson, Adam L Gordon, Andrew D Duckworth, Xavier L Griffin, Ben J Ollivere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abbas SeeSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lauren A TaylorSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Katie E RollinsSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David W HewsonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adam L GordonWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Andrew D DuckworthUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Xavier L GriffinBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, The Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ben J OllivereSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The number of hip fractures is increasing, with significant mortality and morbidity, particularly among frail and comorbid patients. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have proven effective in elective orthopaedics, but this has not been investigated in people with hip fractures. This study aimed to identify current perioperative practice and develop a cohesive ERAS pathway tailored for hip fracture patients, to standardize and optimize care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study across trauma professionals. The survey was disseminated to an expert panel via direct mailing through research collaboratives and social media. Net promoter scores (NPS) were used to quantify survey responses, with a score of over 30 indicating that respondents felt strongly that a particular intervention should be included in the ERAS pathway. Results: Responses were received from 51 institutions and a variety of trauma professionals. Respondents rated preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative interventions for inclusion in an ERAS pathway. Highly rated preoperative intervention included nerve blockade (NPS = 81) and delirium risk assessment (NPS = 69). Avoidance of intraoperative hypotension (NPS = 45) was the only perioperative intervention scoring above 30. Key postoperative interventions included geriatric review (NPS = 74) and Day 0 mobilization (NPS = 53). Overall, 87.5% of respondents expressed willingness to join a trial comparing ERAS to standard care. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for a standardized ERAS pathway for people who experience hip fractures. Key recommendations include preoperative optimization, early mobilization, and multidisciplinary input, all of which align with existing ERAS guidelines. Further research should focus on conducting feasibility studies to refine and validate this pathway.

Identifiers

PMID40915645
PMCPMC12414614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.