ArticleDiabetes research and clinical practice2025
Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and risk of limb complications in individuals with diabetic eye disease.
Article in Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endothelial dysfunction in human diabetic vascular complications: translating single-cell transcriptomics into therapeutic opportunities.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the association between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and lower extremity complications in diabetic eye disease (DED), and compare risks among ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used a U.S. electronic health records network. Adults with DED receiving ≥3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (IVI) were compared to those receiving ≤2 (controls). Outcomes included diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and lower extremity amputation (LEA). Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced baseline characteristics. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for LEA, above-ankle LEA, and DFU in the overall cohort and subgroups with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), peripheral artery disease (PAD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or prior DFUs.
resultsOf 448,100 individuals with DED, 35,269 received ≥3 injections; 34,070 remained in each group after matching. IVI was associated with higher risk of LEA (HR 1.54 [95 % CI 1.38-1.72]), above-ankle LEA (HR 1.31 [1.08-1.59]), and DFU (HR 1.36 [1.30-1.42]) versus controls. LEA risk was greater in IVI versus control subgroups with PDR, PAD, ESRD, or DFUs. Risks were similar across agents.
conclusionsAnti-VEGF therapy in DED was linked to increased DFU and LEA risk, especially in high-risk subgroups. Prospective studies are needed for confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.